| 
		
		(United States Related) | 
		
		 Created Date: 11-Mar-2019  | 
	
	
		| Elected Control 
		by Political Party in the United States since the 1960s through 2019 | 
		
		 Last updated: 26-Sep-2025  | 
	
	
		| at the State Legislation, Governorship 
		and Federal Elected Area | 
	    
		      | 
	
	
		| A
			A
			A 
			help
	     | 
	    
		    
			
	     | 
	
 
Sections
 
	
		Most likely all Governments in the world have recognized war, or the 
		threat of war, as a formidable political tool:
			- A distraction against the citizens of the country to hide theft 
			and treason by their leaders that include captains of industry. 
			
 
			- A method for profiteering wealth for manufacturing of any area 
			of required weapons, transportation, and food provisions that can 
			involve money to the leadership with legal consulting compensation 
			and stocks in the companies.
 
		 
		What is not always recognized as an equivalent method of
		a Political Party in power 
		creating false Social Issues to hide theft and mismanagement by their 
		leaders: 
		
			- The deliberate fabrication of social injustice can be used to 
			manipulate media information news stories to distract from 
			Government problems and incompetence.
 
			- The exploitation of unemployment in an area to set up government 
			funded programs that spin-off money back to some Political Party's 
			member in private ownership of a company for the government 
			supported programs.
 
		 
		In 1939, Adolf Hitler used "Operation 
		Himmler" in a propaganda use of a false Social Issue, was expertly 
		used to accomplish the goals of conquering Poland by: 
		
			- Gorilla civilian warfare by destroying and sabotaging government 
			and private building and services that were also part of Poland's 
			eastern border defenses.
 
			- Influenced the opinions of Germans and other countries to hate 
			the Polish.
 
			- Creating a means for the next phase of a military invasion that 
			the other countries in Europe deemed justified before WWII started.
 
			 
			The Roman Historian
Publius 
Cornelius Tacitus who had many insightful quotes, wrote: "It is human nature to hate those whom we have injured." 
		 
		In modern-times, there are Political Theorist that are often exposing 
		the use of creating social issues when a political party is facing 
		negative scrutiny in the media to take attention away from the real 
		problems facing political-party leadership of government.    | 
	
The Paramount Problem
The paramount problem with any democratic type-of society is the people who 
are not the Politicians.  The Politicians reflect the ability to act in 
ways that are not in the best for society by the amount of tolerance, apathy, 
ignorance, and lack of integrity in the personal lives of the voters.  
Many people do not realize that the oxymoron statement is true which states 
that a liberal person is more conservative than the liberal's counterpart.  
The staunch liberal voter, through agreement or alignment of voters in their 
political party on any topic that they can even disagree, will oppose a 
conservative voter and conservative politicians demanding that their liberal 
viewpoints be allowed even at the expense of the taxpayer, government, and civil 
liberties of others where violence is always considered as part of the tools to 
get a liberals desires accomplished.
For the life-time of this author dating back to the 1960s, liberals have 
conducted events that involve destruction of private property, public property, 
violence, and murder with very little negative media coverage and prosecutions.  
The media should reflect information without personal bias, innuendos, 
favoritism, and opinion segments that do not have counterpoint segments.  
	- The
	
	Washington DC Capital Building Attack of 2021 (notice media called it an 
	attack and also a riot) stayed on media outlets for over a year with 
	extremely punitive prosecution for everyone arrested, and very defamatory 
	media coverage that went beyond standards of reporting of news.  
 
	- Before the Washington DC event, there was hundreds of BLM Protests (not 
	called riots or attacks) in dozens of cities, which resulted in many 
	murders, very violent altercations between the BLM members that sent 
	hundreds of people to hospitals, nearly a billion dollars in private and 
	public property damage all of which resulted in very little negative media 
	coverage and very little arrests except for people protecting personal 
	property.
 
The Media has been argued to be a paid ally of the liberal political party 
through overwhelming organized ownership of media outlets that political parties 
know can shape people's viewpoints.  The sad old clich  is unfortunately 
appears to be an axiom for news outlets, which states "if 
it bleeds then it leads in the news story."   
Liberalism Will Ultimately Always Win in Politics
In all of the Democratic style governmental countries, as of the year 2023 
there are 74 democracies, the 
Political Party which allies itself with liberal philosophies will always be the 
controlling and winning elected Political Party over a period of time.  As 
the scriptures and so many commonly known expressions such as "power 
corrupts absolutely" inform us, the problem with anyone of us taking 
a liberal standpoint allows us to be open to eventually having sinful lifestyles 
and viewpoints when allowing and believing there is:
	- No absolute truth, and
 
	- No accountability required in some circumstances.
 
	
		From the Roman Historian
Publius 
Cornelius Tacitus who had many insightful quotes:
			- They have plundered the world, stripping naked the land in their 
			hunger... they driven by greed, if their enemy be rich; by ambition, 
			if poor... They ravage, they slaughter, they seize by false 
			pretenses, and all of this they hail as the construction of empire.  
			And when in their wake nothing remains but a desert, they call that 
			peace.
 
			- The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government.
 
			- If you would know who controls, you then would see who you 
			cannot criticize.
 
			- Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.
 
			- When the State is corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied.
 
		 
		 | 
	
The United States is an example of this observed Political Party problem, 
with the imbalance of power, because of Liberalism. 
Liberalism is 
defined by WIKI and other encyclopedia types of definitions as having many 
positive attributes, where
Conservatism also has many positive attributes.  The wrongful side of 
liberalism is:
	- Not having any standards for people and companies to aspire where 
	governmental money and resources are used to gain votes when there was 
	absolutely no requirement for expenditure of money and resources.  
	
 
	- Ignoring and not enforcing already establish laws because it will offend 
	voting groups.
 
Power and winning elections are being obtained through 
deception in both United States Political Parties, but the Political Party that 
allied itself with Liberalism have the easiest deception tools, methods and 
emissaries to be utilized.  
	- Liberal financial spending will gain favorable public approval.  
 
	- Allying perceived (and event fraudulent) victims will have people believing 
	a Political Party cares for people and the other Political Parties does 
	not.  
 
	- Controlling the content most of the publicized news, by all the possible methods for disseminate information, 
	benefits only Political Party.  It doesn't matter if the content is 
	incorrect.   Nazis propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said "if 
	you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth."
 
Everyone of us will be gravitated to listen to an informational news story 
that shows a victim.  We all want justice (sometimes revenge) for victims 
we hear about in the news.  This fundamental aspect of human-nature is 
additionally relied upon by the entertainment industry of movies, television 
shows, literature and magazines as no one wants to watch a movie where the bad 
people win.  
While wonderful stories, that have no victims or injustice, can gain people's 
attention, the primary reason people spend time to listen and watch any media 
presentation regarding news is an interest in what happened and was there justice.   Injustice and problems can also be invented as a means 
of distraction for the public to not observe real problems and injustice.
In the United States, which primarily has a two party political party 
structure consisting of Democrats and Republicans, it does not matter what the 
Republican Party pledges and tries to accomplish because 
the Democrat Party, 
since at least the 1960s, have dominated control and influence in the news media 
and entertainment media.  By controlling directly and indirectly 
will have the 
greatest ability to influence voters.  Some 
well-known and easily observed deception and omission points:
	- Control and Own the News Informational Sources:  (Most 
	people have the abilities to recognize bias news reporting.)
	(a) Local television news, where the broadcast is often reading from a 
	teleprompter, have
	
	exactly the same information that other television news media 
	broadcasting outlets are reading.  The teleprompter information is 
	provided by companies that sell their informational and broadcast-ready news 
	information.  Local television news media outlets do not have the 
	financial ability to have paid staff working to research, write and organize 
	all of the national and local news informational stories.  Print media 
	outlets such as magazine, newspapers and internet websites utilize the same 
	information news companies.
	(b) National television news media outlets, that do have financial 
	resources, often utilize the same news information with a type-of 
	repackaging.  A simple and minor proof example is a national media 
	outlet will reprint, redisplay and rebroadcast information about an event 
	happening somewhere that was originally investigated somewhere else.
	(While this topic is not listing the ownership and sources of news 
	information being disseminated, bias information is easily discerned when 
	only one side of a topic is presented.  This has been seen for 
	decades.) 
	- Allies in the Entertainment Industry: The entertainment industry, 
	knowing how to gain people for viewing, when dealing with human 
	personalities of primary characters, will almost involve characters with 
	complex moral problems to get viewers interest.  Additionally, 
	conservative viewpoints are routinely made to be target of jokes or to be 
	ridiculed in a very disproportionately scale compared to liberal viewpoints.
	(a) The financial gains, in the entertainment industry, has afforded many 
	participants  
	the ability to literally enjoy a lifestyle of abundance which often tempts 
	these people into excess sinful pleasures addictions with extreme arrogance 
	of self-righteousness that will openly speak in public about conservative 
	ideas of accountability and acting righteously.
	(b) The entertainment movies and television industry often use their shows 
	as a podium to popularize their opinions that too often are trying exonerate 
	themselves from lifestyles that are openly against the scriptures along with 
	the attempts to humilate conservative ideas of accountability and acting 
	righteously.   
Corruption is Impossible to be Eliminated in Democratic 
Governments
	
		Note: It is this author's opinion and a partial reworded excerpt 
		from the Political Party 
		Allegiance Topic:
			- That no matter what is said publicly by a Politician in speeches 
			or seen in the Media concerning any person from any Political Party,
			it is impossible for 
			Politicians to not eventually become corrupted, willingly or 
			unwillingly.   Choosing otherwise means the 
			Politician will be stopped during the election or re-election 
			process, by different Entities In Power (EIP).  These EIP 
			collectively, while different from one-another and compete with one 
			another, are control everything, so that a Politician has to ally 
			themselves with one or more of them.
 
			(a) A Politician has a choice to accept financial 
			compensation, outside of their salary, for doing actions for 
			specific power groups that are behind the scenes, or by not 
			accepting, the Politician becomes a target to be replaced. 
			(b) The higher the public office for the Politician, there are 
			vulnerabilities that will be exploited concerning any type of 
			unethical and immoral proclivity that can be used as part of a type 
			of political blackmail that is done in what is called a dossier. 
			
			J Edgar Hoover is best known in history for creating dossiers on 
			political enemies. 
			(c) At the worst level, there has been sporadic cases of Politicians 
			and assistants to Politicians, having their lives ended by 
			mysterious and sudden medical conditions that appear ordinary on the 
			surface, when previous medical checkups showed no signs. 
			- It has 
			become impossible for anyone of any Political Party to do anything 
			to stop the corruption that has taken over the positions of office 
			from the local to the federal level.   One Political 
			Party, may appear to be more corrupt, from what is partially seen 
			and heard from the Media, but all Politicians serve different power 
			groups, where the power groups hold no political party allegiance, 
			as their goals are financial and power gains.  
 
			- Unfortunately, most of 
			the Media is also completely corrupted, with exception of 
			small independent sources, because the people in power behind the 
			scenes, learned multiple decades ago that by purchasing and 
			controlling the Media, then this allowed the process of 
			misinformation to shape people's opinions. The tools are using 
			half-truths, omissions, false wording, and out right deception. 
			
 
			(a) Do a search on
			
			YouTube and there are numerous examples of TV Stations all repeating 
			the same scripted dialogues. 
		 
		 | 
	
Democrats Are Primarily in Power
This information was summarized from the following links based on 2018 data 
which was primarily taken from these links:
What the data shows is the Democrat 
Party has always been in control since 1961 for the majority of the time at the 
Federal and State Levels.  In the overwhelming majority of the 
biggest and influential cities in the USA, at the city levels in positions of 
mayor and council persons, there are cities that Democrats have been 100% in 
control since the 1960s.  
With this power, the Democrat Party should have already accomplished great 
things, but they have:
	- Not brought back American manufacturing companies from foreign countries 
	like China and southeast Asia.  
 
	- Not stopped foreign workers in Engineering and Computer Sciences to come 
	into the USA to be employed at very low wages to supplant American citizens 
	along with the theft intellectual property.
 
	- Not stopped the move of Pharmaceutical 
	Development to other countries.
 
	- Not stopped the ever-increasing numbers of peoples from many countries 
	coming into the USA illegally and then given living expenses, free education 
	and so much more.
 
	
		| From a purely statistical standpoint, and not taking into account 
		philosophies of the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party can be blamed for 
		as much as 60% to 100% of the problems not fixed in the United States 
		based on their periods of time while being in office.   | 
	
What People of Each Political Party Believe
There has come a belief, in recent times, that the following two statements are true.  
They are 
regarding the core mentality of a Democrat and Republican citizen:
	- Democrat People will always believe, want and demand that other people 
	should take care of them based on the emotional based reasoning that there 
	are people with more financial resources, better physical abilities, 
	ethnicity and good 
	luck.  Therefore, the Democrat person feels it is only fair to be given 
	financial benefits at the expense and taxation of others through the 
	government so that everyone can have the same benefits and even luxuries in 
	life.  The Democrat Politician knows this and therefore promises to 
	deliver these ideals that requires higher taxation and restricting 
	legislation.
 
	- Republican People will always believe, want and desire that everyone 
	participates in the process of improving their own lives by working for 
	themselves and also to never rely upon and receive anything that was not 
	earned.  Therefore, the Republican person finds it very objectionable 
	to see anyone getting any benefits that was not earned.  The Republican 
	Politician knows this and therefore promises to relieve tax burdens and 
	guarantee accountability.  When Republican Politicians introduce 
	legislation to cut taxes and free up business to operate, then Democrats 
	come out in force in the Media to state everything is to benefit the rich.
 
The Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, has many facets.  In 
business journals there has been the reciprocal additional definition given when 
dealing with a company team of workers that can also apply to sports teams:
	- 20% of the people do 80% of the work, 
 
	- 80% of the people only do 20% of the work.
 
This 80/20 rule can be applied to people in view of their preferred political 
party.  It implies that the 
majority of people will gravitate and fall into the category of the Democrat 
philosophies because of the belief that they will be taken care of by the 
government.  This is why the 
Democrat Party will always be the winning political party.
Democrat's Biggest Problem
Read the topic on Conundrum of 
Socialism in the United States before continuing.  
There are no rural, inner-city or sparsely populated areas of the United 
States where poverty, crime and moral-decay is rampant that are Republican 
controlled and have a majority of Republican identifying citizens.  
All the areas that have rampant poverty, crime and moral-decay are 100% Democrat controlled areas that have been that way for 
decades since the 1960s, where after 60 years there should have been an 
improvement that cannot be blamed on Republicans.  
At A High Level
As just noted above, the Democrat Party has predominately contained an edge 
by having the most voters.  With this power, they have accomplished some 
good things at the Federal Level along with a few areas at the State Level.
	- In 1930s, created the New Deal to create jobs by Governmental Works 
	programs, stabilizing of farm prices, electricity to rural communities. 
	
 
	- In 1935 crated the Social Security Act to provide assistance to 
	retirees, unemployed people, widows and orphans.
 
	- In 1944, signed the GI Bill to help veterans returning from WWII to get 
	a jump start on mortgages, business, tuition and more
 
	- In 1964, signed the Civil Rights Act?
 
	- Since the 1960s, to name a few areas: there has been a great deal of 
	legislation to protect the environment, equal access for the handicapped to 
	all buildings and parking, promote equality for people with alternate 
	lifestyles, protection for animals and minimal wage guarantees. 
 
At a very high level, the Republican Party has accomplished some great things 
at the Federal, State, City and County areas.  Many people, when being 
honest, would point out that the Republican Party has done far more 
than the Democrats despite the lack of times in power.
	- The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 under President Abraham Lincoln.
 
	- Gave the right to vote to women in 1872.
 
	- Construction of the Panama Canal in 1904
 
	- Elected the first woman to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1916.
 
	- Construction of the Hover Dam in 1928
 
	- Construction of the Interstate Highway System in 1956
 
	- Desegregating Public Schools in 1957 with protection issued by Dwight 
	Eisenhower.
 
	- The Civil Rights Act of 1960 under Dwight Eisenhower.
 
	- President Regan Tax Cuts of 1981.
 
	- President Regan works and succeeds in the collapse of the Soviet Union.
 
	- Republican Congress balances the budget in 1998-2001.
 
Summary Data Showing Democrat Control through 2019
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Control Percentage by Political Party | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Years 1960 through Year 2019 | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		State Legislation | 
		
		Governorships | 
		
		Federal Total Control | 
		
		Federal Majority Control | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		Democrat | 
		
		60.53% | 
		
		53.19% | 
		
		26.67% | 
		
		60.00% | 
		
		<-Winner | 
	
	
		| 
		Republican | 
		
		34.21% | 
		
		44.68% | 
		
		10.00% | 
		
		40.00% | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		Split/Tie | 
		
		5.26% | 
		
		n/a | 
		
		n/a | 
		
		n/a | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Control in the United States | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		Democrat | 
		
		57.91% | 
		
		<-Winner | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		Republican | 
		
		39.63% | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
Detailed Data Showing Democrat Control
Split means inconclusive control of one party.
	
		
		
		
		
	
	
		|   | 
		
		State Legislations controlled | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		# | 
		
		Year | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		Split | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		| 
		1 | 
		
		1960 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		6 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		2 | 
		
		1962 | 
		
		25 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		6 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		3 | 
		
		1964 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		6 | 
		
		10 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		4 | 
		
		1966 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		9 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		5 | 
		
		1968 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		6 | 
		
		1970 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		9 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		7 | 
		
		1972 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		7 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		8 | 
		
		1974 | 
		
		37 | 
		
		4 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		9 | 
		
		1976 | 
		
		35 | 
		
		4 | 
		
		10 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		10 | 
		
		1978 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		11 | 
		
		7 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		11 | 
		
		1980 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		5 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		12 | 
		
		1982 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		11 | 
		
		4 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		13 | 
		
		1984 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		11 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		14 | 
		
		1986 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		9 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		15 | 
		
		1988 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		8 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		16 | 
		
		1990 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		6 | 
		
		13 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		17 | 
		
		1992 | 
		
		25 | 
		
		8 | 
		
		16 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		18 | 
		
		1994 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		19 | 
		
		1996 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		11 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		20 | 
		
		1998 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		21 | 
		
		2000 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		15 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		22 | 
		
		2002 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		14 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		23 | 
		
		2003 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		24 | 
		
		2004 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		11 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		25 | 
		
		2005 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		9 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		26 | 
		
		2007 | 
		
		24 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		9 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		27 | 
		
		2008 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		12 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		28 | 
		
		2009 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		29 | 
		
		2010 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		30 | 
		
		2011 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		31 | 
		
		2012 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		6 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		32 | 
		
		2013 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		5 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		33 | 
		
		2014 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		5 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		34 | 
		
		2015 | 
		
		11 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		35 | 
		
		2016 | 
		
		11 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		8 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		36 | 
		
		2017 | 
		
		12 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		6 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		37 | 
		
		2018 | 
		
		13 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		5 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		38 | 
		
		2019 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		23 | 
		
		13 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		State Legislation Control | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		60.53% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		34.21% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Even/Tie | 
		
		5.26% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
 
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Governorships controlled | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		# | 
		
		Year | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		Independent | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		| 
		1 | 
		
		1960 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		2 | 
		
		1962 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		3 | 
		
		1964 | 
		
		33 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		4 | 
		
		1966 | 
		
		25 | 
		
		25 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		5 | 
		
		1967 | 
		
		24 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		6 | 
		
		1968 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		7 | 
		
		1969 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		8 | 
		
		1970 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		9 | 
		
		1971 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		10 | 
		
		1972 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		11 | 
		
		1973 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		12 | 
		
		1974 | 
		
		36 | 
		
		13 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		13 | 
		
		1976 | 
		
		37 | 
		
		12 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		14 | 
		
		1978 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		15 | 
		
		1979 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		16 | 
		
		1980 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		17 | 
		
		1982 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		18 | 
		
		1983 | 
		
		35 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		19 | 
		
		1984 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		20 | 
		
		1986 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		24 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		21 | 
		
		1988 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		22 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		22 | 
		
		1989 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		23 | 
		
		1990 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		24 | 
		
		1992 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		25 | 
		
		1993 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		26 | 
		
		1994 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		27 | 
		
		1995 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		28 | 
		
		1996 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		32 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		29 | 
		
		1998 | 
		
		17 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		30 | 
		
		1999 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		31 | 
		
		2000 | 
		
		19 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		32 | 
		
		2001 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		2 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		33 | 
		
		2002 | 
		
		24 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		34 | 
		
		2004 | 
		
		22 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		35 | 
		
		2006 | 
		
		28 | 
		
		22 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		36 | 
		
		2008 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		37 | 
		
		2009 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		24 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		38 | 
		
		2010 | 
		
		26 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		39 | 
		
		2011 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		40 | 
		
		2012 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		41 | 
		
		2013 | 
		
		20 | 
		
		30 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		42 | 
		
		2014 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		29 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		43 | 
		
		2015 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		44 | 
		
		2016 | 
		
		18 | 
		
		31 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		45 | 
		
		2017 | 
		
		15 | 
		
		34 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		46 | 
		
		2018 | 
		
		16 | 
		
		33 | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		47 | 
		
		2019 | 
		
		23 | 
		
		27 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		25 | 
		
		21 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Governorship Control | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		53.19% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		44.68% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
 
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
		|   | 
		
		USA Presidency, Senate and Congress Control | 
		  | 
		
		Total Control | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Majority Control | 
	
	
		| 
		# | 
		
		Year | 
		
		President | 
		
		Senate | 
		
		House | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		| 
		1 | 
		
		1961 1963 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		2 | 
		
		1963 1965 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		3 | 
		
		1965 1967 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		4 | 
		
		1967 1969 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		5 | 
		
		1969-1971 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		6 | 
		
		1971-1973 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		7 | 
		
		1973-1975 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		8 | 
		
		1975-1977 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		9 | 
		
		1977 1979 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		10 | 
		
		1979 1981 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		11 | 
		
		1981-1983 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		12 | 
		
		1983-1985 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		13 | 
		
		1985-1987 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		14 | 
		
		1987-1989 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		15 | 
		
		1989-1991 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		16 | 
		
		1991-1993 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		17 | 
		
		1993 1995 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		18 | 
		
		1995-1997 | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		19 | 
		
		1997-1999 | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		20 | 
		
		1999-2001 | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		21 | 
		
		2001-2003 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		22 | 
		
		2003 2005 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		23 | 
		
		2005 2007 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		24 | 
		
		2007-2009 | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		25 | 
		
		2009 2011 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		26 | 
		
		2011-2013 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		27 | 
		
		2013-2015 | 
		
		D | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		
		  | 
	
	
		| 
		28 | 
		
		2015-2017 | 
		
		D | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		29 | 
		
		2017-2019 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		| 
		30 | 
		
		2019-2021 | 
		
		R | 
		
		R | 
		
		D | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		1 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		Republican | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Total Control at Federal Level | 
		  | 
		
		8 | 
		
		3 | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		18 | 
		
		12 | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Total Federal Control | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		26.67% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		10.00% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		
		Majority Federal Control | 
		
		Democrat | 
		
		60.00% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
	
		|   | 
		  | 
		  | 
		
		Republican | 
		
		40.00% | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
		  | 
	
Political Hate Speech against Conservatives
Political hate speech is using words that insult undeserving individuals or 
groups of people based on attributers of ethnicity, religious beliefs, sexual 
orientations, physical disability, and mental disabilities.  Hate speech is 
in either verbal or written form, and in Politics is predominately used as a weapon 
against someone that does not necessarily agree with the antagonists' ideology 
politically. 
Since the 1990s, in the United States, there are overwhelming numbers in the 
multiple of thousands of 
people, all identifying as Democrats (NOT ALL DEMOCRATS), that react to anything they do not like or 
agree with by:
	- Burning down portion of cities with most notable and not limited to places 
	like Los Angeles, California.
 
	- In large groups of people are looting stores.
 
	- In large groups of people are severely hurting others along with 
	murdering others.
 
	- Attacking the Police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agents.
 
	- Destroying or vandalizing privately owned Tesla vehicles and severely 
	vandalize Tesla Dealerships
 
	- In multiple occasions, conducting long range assignation attempts from 
	the roof top of building with rifles against political adversaries including 
	President to be Donald Trump, Christians, Police Officers, Immigration and 
	Customs Enforcement Agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement vehicles.
 
	- Insisting that free speech is not allowed when it goes against their 
	beliefs.
 
	- Getting on Social Platforms and 
	having Media News Outlet making statements that their evil actions of 
	looting, murdering, and destroying are justified because they don't agree 
	with opinions and political beliefs of conservatives.
 
These same Democrats then call everyone that is conservative: Fascists, 
Racists and Nazis which is unbelievable ignorant, extremely defamatory, insulting, and a complete contradiction as these 
people conducting the listed eight stated actions above are:
	- Doing the same 
actions of
	Hitler's 
Brown Shirts that paved the way for Nazis Germany.  
	(a) Note the Sturmabtelun, Storm Troopers of the 1920 through 1930s, was the starting 
paramilitary organization under Hitler that were also called Brown Shirts 
because of their uniforms. 
	(b) This author is waiting for Democrats to start 
wearing some sort of uniform to unify all of their efforts of stealing, 
vandalism, physically hurting people, and murdering people. 
	- Protesting against Israel with extreme vial hatred.  That is 
	exactly what the Nazis started in the beginnings of their terror reign that 
	lead to their goal of murdering all the Jewish People they could find.  
	See the topic on why is 
	Lucifer still actively trying to eliminate all Jewish people.
 
	
		| The following is an excerpt from the topic on
		Communism and Fascism: The term Fascist is often used as an insult towards people who are conservative.  
Conservative People are those who believe 
in self-reliance and everyone earning their own way with help to only the truly 
needy and are often regarded as Capitalists.  The best definition for 
Fascism comes from "The 
Concise Encyclopedia of Economics": 
"As an economic system, 
fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. 
The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied 
bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism 
was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, 
with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented 
egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive 
persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of 
nationalism and racialism  blood and soil  for the internationalism of both 
classical liberalism and Marxism. 
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society s economic processes through direct state 
operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of 
nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, 
by requiring owners to use their property in the  national interest  that is, as the autocratic authority 
conceived it. ... "  by Sheldon Richman 
		 | 
	
What to read next?
(1)
Communism and Socialism 
vs. Democracy with Additional Thoughts and Clarity on Fascism, (2)
Historical Racism 
in the United States and its use in Politics, (3)
Liberalism and the 
arguments used, (4) 
Racism Test, (5) 
Cops Kill by Race? (6) 
Illegal Immigration - USA and Mexico with those who cross into the USA illegally 
(7) USA in the Bible (9)
Political Party Blind Allegiance 
(10) A 
Democrat Conundrum (11)
	Peaceful People are Irrelevant Point