Non-Elected Individuals Run Countries.  As an example:

Created Date: 5-Jun-2017

One Political Party Has Been Destroying USA

Last updated: 1-Jun-2021

Given the Chance the Other Political Party in the USA would do the same  
A A A  help

 
1 Forward 2 One World Government Eventually Needed to Save Humanity?
3 Four Examples to Understand Human Nature in Government 4 The United States Two Party System
  Group of Thieves    
  Universal Credit Card    
  80 / 20 Rule    
  Government Work Force    
5 Weakness in the United States Infrastructure 6 Exit Strategy - No complete Plan Then It Will Fail
7 Ignorance of Voters 8 Cycle of Power Over The Poor, Lower and Middle Class
9 Do your own research 10 Short List of Systematic Slow Demolition
11 Christian Perspective 12 Gloria Alvarez

Forward

This is a very important topic that absolutely has spiritual significance.   Before reading this topic, it is a good idea to read Communism and Socialism, Media's effect on Racism and Cultural Prejudice, Historical Racism, Abuse of Power, Good People Argument before continuing with this topic. 

Secondly, we all must understand that most of the countries in the world are not truly run by a Political Party.  This may seem like unsubstantiated conjectures but consider it for yourself and draw your own conclusions.  Countries are run by Non-Elected Individuals (NEI), sometimes called NGOs, who use money to win elections by disinformation and extortion.  When we sometimes see Politicians having a fatal heart attack, a fatal drunk driving accident or an unexplained suicide then we may wonder if this was the penalty for not complying or being a threat against NEIs.  We often see Politicians appear to be rewarded financially in elected positions with income that is outside of the salary from the governmental position.  Was this for complying or giving favorable benefits to NEIs?  The evidence is plainly seen, in all countries, because most Politicians gain financial wealth when in office (at the Federal level in many countries they become multi-millionaires). 

Empirical evidence shows Politicians often have offices staffed by appointments made by the NEIs to make sure their requirements of the Politicians are carried out along with open communication access.  This goes up to the highest levels of office including Presidents, Prime Ministers, Cabinet Members, Senators, Congressmen, Judges and everything beneath.  Fortunately, these NEIs, who operate behind the scenes, are not necessarily in league with one another.  This causes so many different rival actions to benefit one business and country over another for a period of time.  These NEIs are not always known and purposely maintain anonymity.  The proof and level of this action will stager the mind when looking at the unseen hand in human history which Christians should be aware.  For our sakes, God is always in control and always works circumstances for His Will. 

This is a very difficult matter to summarize in one paragraph, but it is essential for Christians to understand along with being relevant in Political Party allegiance.  These NEIs move politicians around like pieces on a Chess Board.  NEIs primarily use the Political Party that has the most changes to win in elections but hedge their actions with lower financial support to minor candidates.  In the USA, one Party since the 1960s has controlled 60% to 100% of Elected Offices in the local to highest federal level, while the managed Media likes to portray the problems in the USA is caused by the other Party.  This does not mathematically make sense but unfortunately this is believed by the uninformed public.  This does not mean the other Party would fix the problems as the NEIs would just jump over to that other Party and unfortunately already do have controls in the other Party.   

What are the long-term goals of NEIs?  It points to the ability to control money and have power over entire economies and eventually establish a one world government.  This can be done in so many ways such as devaluing of currency, destroying manufacturing in one country in favor of manufacturing in another, breaking down trade and tariff walls, promoting the destruction of the family unit to gain control by requiring subsistence income for the common man, etc. 

It is this author's opinion:
  1. That no matter what is said publicly by a Politician in speeches or seen in the Media concerning any person from any Political Party, it is impossible for Politicians to not eventually become corrupted, willingly or unwillingly.   Choosing otherwise means the Politician will be stopped during the election or re-election process, by different NEIs.  These NEIs collectively, while different from one-another and compete with one another, are control everything, so that a Politician has to ally themselves with one or more of them.
    (a) A Politician has a choice to accept financial compensation, outside of their salary, for doing actions for specific NEIs that are behind the scenes, or by not accepting, the Politician becomes a target to be replaced.
    (b) The higher the public office for the Politician, there are vulnerabilities that will be exploited concerning any type of unethical and immoral proclivity that can be used as part of a type of political blackmail that is done in what is called a dossier.  J Edgar Hoover is best known in history for creating dossiers on political enemies.
    (c) At the worst level, there has been sporadic cases of Politicians and assistants to Politicians, having their lives ended by mysterious and sudden medical conditions that appear ordinary on the surface, when previous medical checkups showed no signs.
  2. It has become impossible for anyone of any Political Party to do anything to stop the corruption that has taken over the positions of office from the local to the federal level.   One Political Party, may appear to be more corrupt, from what is partially seen and heard from the Media, but all Politicians serve different power groups, where the power groups hold no political party allegiance, as their goals are financial and power gains. 
  3. Unfortunately, most of the Media is also completely corrupted, with exception of small independent sources, because the NEIs behind the scenes, learned multiple decades ago that by purchasing and controlling the Media, then this allowed the process of misinformation to shape people's opinions. The tools are using half-truths, omissions, false wording, and outright deception. 
    (a) Do a search on YouTube and there are numerous examples of TV Stations all repeating the same scripted dialogues.

One World Government Eventually Needed to Save Humanity?

For several reasons, it appears that a one world government will eventually become necessary with the economies of scale concerning weapons, terrorism and even religious persecution can have a small group, such as terrorist group with small finances, bring large nations to their knees in submission.  Three examples:

  1. A handful of people with a very small radioactive bomb, called a dirty bomb, can inflict major damage in a populated city area.
  2. Terrorist with poison could destroy a water supply.
  3. A small specific type of atomic bomb can cause an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) that can destroy circuitry in everything electronic for a specific geographic area.

A world-wide policing force will eventually be required along with world-wide governance to manage weapons such as radioactive substances, biological warfare, etc.  Terrorists and madmen can make a mockery of a Nation’s borders and some Nations do not have the ability to police themselves.  There is one thought provoking question.  Is terrorism being used as means to an end so that a one world government can be established?

Four Examples to Understand Human Nature

As a review, you can study scriptures on rewards in Heaven and how the Christian is judged.  If the emphases is on showing ourselves approved and then our actions do matter which includes the way we vote.  Grace and Mercy is given by God because of His Love and He expects everyone to be accountable in all things.  The first two examples, with some paraphrasing, were given by Chuck Missler in several of his Bible Commentaries.

(1) A Group of Thieves - Suppose you are moving to a new town and have a large amount of cash with you which is needed for the moving expenses.  As you are walking down a street you are robbed by two men who take half of your money.  Suppose you find out that the two men had two other men working with them who were operating as lookouts and backups.  Suppose you find out that 51% of the town voted that it was lawful for these four thieves to operate but required them to give half of the stolen money to the city's treasury.   Do you feel it was permissible because it was voted into law and do you see the parallel problem why a majority vote does not mean it is a good thing?   NOTE: Many small towns, cities and even States in the USA take advantage of travelers with traffic "speed traps", extra taxes when using Services, extra fees for renting a car, extra fees for hotels/motels, and so much more.  Some States in the USA require "Out of State" drivers to pay for traffic tickets directly to the Policemen at the time of the offense, calling it a posted bond on the citation to ensure the driver will show up to court or alternatively as the payment if not contested, which is against due process of proven guilt.   

(2) Universal Credit Card - Suppose that four friends decide, when going to dinner once every week, that they will just split the dinner equally where each person will pay 25% of the bill.  How long does it take for each person to order the most expensive items and appetizers?  Suppose in a town that everyone agrees to use a commonly owned credit card for needed repairs on their home which include appliances, yard service and furniture.  At the end of each month everyone must equally pay a percentage of the bill.  How long does it take before many of the people decide to buy the best refrigerator, update their furniture, get the best lawn service, etc knowing the cost is equally distributed?

(3) 80 / 20 Rule - A well-known cliché is the expression that 80 percent of the people rely on 20 percent of the people in a business to do 80 percent of the work.  Businesses are always looking for ways to improve employee productivity and also deal with another internal financial problem known as shrinkage.  The percentages are never static, but many clothing retailers have reported that as much as 18% of their inventory is stolen by employees every year.  Does this statistic or the 80/20 cliché mean 8 of 10 people do not do their fair share or nearly 2 of 10 people are stealing?  Have you taken a pencil, pen or paper pad from work or done worse?

(4) Government Work Force - Without the intentional demeaning intended towards a whole workforce group of people, unfortunately all of us do not expect efficiency and excellence when dealing with government services and agencies.  This is primarily caused by many factors such as lack of Competition, Accountability and/or Appropriate Wages (CAAW).  While there are many exceptional people in governmental positions, often the job does not foster increased performance and intellectual growth.  Many governmental jobs also pay less than the private sector which increases the problem of those who would achieve more in governmental positions, will often leave and go into the private sector.  To add on to the problem, many administrative heads in government are staffed through voter elections, where the elected person rising through the elected ranks in the government agency/workforce, formerly was in a lesser position which did not attract the best type of management people because of CAAW.  These same people continue to move through election processes from minor positions in Municipality, County and State to potentially make it to Federal positions.  In the United States and other countries, potentially the people who end up running and winning elections at the highest levels which affect business, economy and military security were not the best equipped with knowledge for their positions, not even mentioning the allegiance to entities who supported them financially which might be 180 degrees opposed to the best interest of the country.  Do you see why many people, regardless of political affiliation, have recognized the importance of term limits, private sector candidates, and so many other constraints which elected officials oppose for obvious reasons?

The United States Two Party System

The United States has primarily a two-Party system consisting of Democrats and Republicans.  It can be argued that each Party has voters that will vote for their Party's candidate no matter what the candidate is doing in their public and private life along with their voting record which might be diametrically opposite to what the candidate has described in their platform's tenants.  

This problem has left a percentage of the voting public disenfranchised to make change when it is needed.  Additionally, the voter who would want to remove someone, who is not the best for a position in a situation, will have too many obstacles to overcome that are aided and abetted by powers moving behind the scenes of the electoral process, which is explained above with NEIs.  This aspect is not in the scope of this topic.

In several small and large areas, that have local elected officials, have been ruled by one Political Party for 50 plus years where these same areas often have the worst job opportunities, the highest taxes, the highest crimes rates and the worst education systems.  One Political Party dominates in this area where the other Political Party, which does have bad areas, is not even remotely close.

Weaknesses in the United States Infrastructure

In the United States history, there have been many great and absolutely righteous corrections such as the end of slavery, the right to vote for women, limitations of a work week's hours, minimal wage, social security and laws to protect against racism, age, gender, religious belief, cultural prejudices and other areas.  Some may say it has not gone far enough, but these were just some examples and are not analyzing the completeness or success.  These examples do benchmark outstanding changes that did not require volumes of legal documentation and special exceptions.

Many of the Framers of the United States Constitution have written and warned that the government that governs best is the government who governs least.  The same Framers have also written that the United States Constitution will fail when people do not hold themselves bound to the higher power under God.  Is it simple to see, that they are correct, by looking at a few areas such as:

  1. Taking advantage of unearned income,
  2. Taking advantage of undeserved benefits,
  3. Stealing or not working when on the clock or when not being watched,
  4. Do not pay taxes when they are owed,
  5. Do not keep the family unit prized and honored.

Exit Strategy - No Complete Plan Then It Will Fail

A public-sector government function needs to be run as a business with "checks and balances" and a plan. 

Consider some hypothetical and real situations:

  1. A bridge is needed over a waterway to connect areas where people are living.  Local government creates a toll for users of the bridge to pay for the bridge.  When the bridge is paid for, does the government remove the toll?
  2. A business is wanting to move to take advantage of infrastructure in a better area, so the local government gives them a tax break for a specified duration in order to pay for the business's move.  When the duration is completed, does the business continue to get the tax break or does the elected officials sign a continuation because they receive campaign contributions from owners of the business?  Should there have been an irrevocable line item in the tax break legislature that removed the possibility of future tax breaks after the duration of the initial tax break?
  3. A group based on (a) race, (b) culture or (c) a specific group of immigrants entering the United States are given tax breaks, free tuition in universities, housing and food allowances.  This can be argued as a righteous and justified initiative.  At what point in the future does the initiative stop and why wasn't there a duration provision put in the legislation?  Why are some groups who are far smaller in number than others never even given consideration?  (Note: with the growth of one specific minority group in the USA, they will eventually become the majority.)  When the groups, that once were smaller and are now larger, do they get their legislation removed?  Do the groups that once were the majority and become smaller, do they become eligible for incentives, tax breaks and minority status legislation? 
If we are intellectually honest, we can see that without an Exit Strategy, the laws and legislation that were designed initially to benefit society can eventually result in causing small problems to very great problems.  

Ignorance of Voters

Consider a situation where a person is:

  1. Given the name of the Political Party which is the one the person affiliates and supports.  
  2. Given goals and what fixes their Political Party want to implement which are actually the other Political Party's goals and fixes.

Many people, if they are not informed, would agree say that they support those goals and fixes of the other Political Party.

This situation has been proven in studies and a source of many comedy shows when asking someone of "X" Political Party if they support their "X" Party's candidate's stance on a topic and their answer is "yes" when in reality it is the other Party's Candidate stance. 

The Power of a Political Party is in its ability to shape public opinion through Media.  The tools are propaganda, lies and information omission. A popular term for this technique is called "spin".   Another tool in use is advertising that portrays large support by a rally when there was really limited attendance.  It is done by limited camera angles.  The most common method used by TV News is information omission of the whole truth or facts so that viewer's emotions will support an initiative and will accept it.

Currently in the United States, one Political Party has dominated the Media outlets and also the elected positions throughout the country from the 1960s until the present.  The other Political Party has had only a handful of newspapers and recently in the year 1996 one major Cable TV station.  The dominant Political Party has even made political jokes about the other Political Party's ineptness in shaping public opinion in any area.  The other Political Party has only dominated one public venue and that is Radio where hosts have time to speak in detail and callers can speak in anonymity with no fear of political correctness.

Cycle of Power Over The Poor, Lower and Middle Class

Taxing of the rich is touted as the solution to help the lower and lower middle class.  One Political Party has been using this for decades and decades saying the richest 10% of Americans are not paying their fair share.  Information on countless documentaries show that even if the 10% wealthiest gave all their earning for a year it would not run the country for any significant amount of time.  In the USA, when adding up Federal, State, Local and municipality taxation on an individual, the person is paying over 60% of their income in taxes (based on 2015 statistics for highest per capital States in the USA).  This has been increasing since the 1960s, when in the 1960s, a blue-collar job still allowed the head of the house hold to take care of financial needs of the family such as a stay-at-home wife/mother, a house, a car and a savings account besides the primary checking account.  Now, that is not only impossible for a blue-collar job, but it takes both parents working with an alarming percentage of the population of blue-collar households still requiring government food and other assistance which was not there decades ago.  Still the rhetoric from one Political Party is asserting that the problems is because the rich do not pay their fair share.

The other problem is one Political Party keeps taxing more and more along with raising minimum wage requirements.  This has caused countless job areas to move permanently out of the country which is hurting the very people that it was claiming to help.  Additionally, this same Political Party, keeps increasing spending above the budget.  Elected officials of this Political Party have this mantra: "We will tax and spend our country into prosperity!"

Free enterprise and business creation have been becoming very difficult from taxation and government startup regulations.  The percentage of business making it past the first year are at an alarming failure rate.  In Western European countries, there are many laws that require a business to guarantee a job for an individual even when the business is not making any profit where penalties against the owner of the business, for not complying, have crippled incentives to create new businesses. 

In the USA, many small businesses in specific services areas such as the restaurant, construction and home repairs often employ workers off the accounting books completely or only partially.  Wages are paid in cash so that the owner can fire a bad employee and not face taxation from the unemployment governmental entities.  The employee does not complain because there is more income without taxes and also fears the consequences of unreported income.  Additionally, this allows workers to get government financial incentives for free because they can appear to be at the poverty or lower income level.  Many restaurants keep two sets of books where one has reduced sales to limit taxing and another set of books to show potential buyers of the restaurant how much income is really made. 

There are many case studies that show that small businesses in the USA, take care of the vast majority of employment.  Can the question be asked if the rich or the common worker is not paying their fair share of taxes?  Consider the other question.  What is the incentive for wealthy people to start a business if they are taxed to high?  The rise of China as a world leader in manufacturing answers that question as more and more Western Countries close manufacturing facilities.

Do your own research - 1960 through 2019

When looking at many information sources, there is enough negative things that can be said about both Political Parties in the United States that would take books of information to expose the corruption and evil deeds done by members of both parties

As an extreme example consider Racism where the Democrat Party, since the 1960s, has spearheaded and passed many laws for equality, protection and advancement of people of every ethnicity yet has members in the Political Party who have documented past allegiance to the KKK as seen in this article in WikiPedia on just a few of specific party.  The uninformed voter was excited to vote "yes" for laws dealing with equality, but most likely didn't know their elected official could have been in the KKK, while this same representative was a signed supporter of the legislation.  Absolutely, the KKK is an evil organization!!!  The point is how could voters even put and keep these people in elected positions?  When a Republican is found to have done anything racists, his Party's voters always vote him out and most cases the Party forces him to resign. 

At a very high level, the Democrat Party has predominately contained an edge by having the most voters.  With this power, they have accomplished some very good things at the Federal Level along with some areas at the State Level.

  1. In 1930s, created the New Deal to create jobs by Governmental Works programs, stabilizing of farm prices, electricity to rural communities.
  2. In 1935 crated the Social Security Act to provide assistance to retirees, unemployed people, widows and orphans.
  3. In 1944, signed the GI Bill to help veterans returning from WWII to get a jump start on mortgages, business, tuition and more
  4. In 1964, signed the Civil Rights Act?
  5. Since the 1960s, to name a few areas: there has been a great deal of legislation to protect the environment, equal access for the handicapped to all buildings and parking, promote equality for people with alternate lifestyles, protection for animals and minimal wage guarantees.
Registered Voters in 2018  
Democrat 40% Replubican 29% Independent 28% Others 2% Total
44,242,975 32,570,817 31,489,028 2,640,597 110,943,417
39.8789% 29.3580% 28.3830% 2.3801%  

The Democrat Party, since the 1960s, have been in power nearly 60% of the time when considering the State Legislations, Governorships and Federal elected Positions as seen below.  Click here to see the detail data with the summaries.

  Control Percentage by Political Party  
  Years 1960 through Year 2019  
  State Legislation Governorships Federal Total Control Federal Majority Control  
Democrat 60.53% 53.19% 26.67% 60.00% <-Winner
Republican 34.21% 44.68% 10.00% 40.00%  
Split/Tie 5.26% n/a n/a n/a  
           
  Control in the United States      
Democrat 57.91% <-Winner      
Republican 39.63%        

On the unfortunate negative side there is a very long list of problems.  Keep in mind the reasons why there are problems are listed above in the other sections of this topic.  As noted above, if the power base was with the other political party, then this list would be against them.  These problems are caused because of the nature of mankind is self-centered, power hungry and ignorant of Godly values.  Many of us have heard this popular quote from George Santayana, who wrote "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."  The negative traits of people in power have been seen clearly thought-out time.  The Framers of the United States Constitution, in many opinion writings, have said that this Constitution would only work when the citizens feared God.

Short List of Systematic Slow Demolition

Therefore, while keeping this whole topic in mind, what Political Party in the United States had these points against them since the 1960s:

  1. Has made it their practice to never lower taxes for the general citizen at the Federal, State, County and City levels since at least the 1960s? 
  2. Has been behind every tax increase for the general citizen at the Federal, State, County and City levels since at least the 1960s?
  3. Has increased the minimum wage when it wasn't even warranted to cause the loss of jobs?  With increases in the minimal wage, this has caused businesses to move jobs overseas.  With the increase in the minimum wage, this has caused products and services to cost more which made the minimum wage increase pointless?
  4. Has been in control, as much as 100% of the time in the most populous Cities and the majority of the time at the Federal level and State Level since at least the 1960s? 
  5. Have had exclusive power since the 1960s in the most populated cities.    
  6. Has the most voter fraud cases?  Do an Internet Search on voter fraud in Chicago?
  7. Has caused Social Security taxes to be increased and bailed out repeatedly when it put it in the General Federal Budget?  (How come the Media never points out that Welfare doesn't have a budget or a limit, but Social Security does?)
  8. Has voted in spending that has bankrupted or nearly bankrupted numerous Municipalities, Cities and also several States?   Examples of five big cities: Detroit, MI; Jefferson County, Al; Orange County, CA; Stockton, CA; San Bernardino County, CA.  
  9. Has voted in City, State and Country spending and legislation based on future revenues that are not financially obtainable?
  10. Has blocked the removal of spending increases?
  11. Has caused California to go from one of the most efficient and profitable States in the Union to deficit spending and possible bankruptcy?  A recent Governor of the other Political Party could not veto or remove the deadlock of the laws and taxes coming out of other Political Party's dominant control of the State which they have had controlled since 1850.   In 2017 the State of Illinois where this party has controlled the General Assembly for years, has caused this State to also face bankruptcy.
  12. Supports illegal immigration without going through the proper channels and uses supposed racism to justify it?
  13. Supports and creates legislation for issuing Drivers Licenses to illegal aliens who then can use this to get voter registration cards along with free welfare benefits?
  14. Knowingly creates massive propaganda that the voters of the other Political Party are going to end Social Security and remove Medicaid without any replacement and continuation for those already in it?  To make matters ever worse the mainstream media never has played an interview or shown a printed document stating that was a goal by the other party to remove Social Security.
  15. Has only removed or forced to resign a few elected Federal Official from Federal office since the 1960s, when the other Political Party has removed or forced dozens of their own elected to leave and even forced a President of their Political Party to resign?
  16. Has voters that will vote in convicted criminals back into office?  Look up Marion Barry
  17. At the Federal and many other Levels, this Political Party rarely unseats an incumbent even when their incumbent is tainted with criminal history. (a) The other Political Party has replaced the tainted candidate
    (b) The other Political Party has voters that have voted out the candidate for even the simplest of infractions in a Primary.
    (c) The other Political Party has in the General Election in many cases even voted in the other Party's candidate (cross party lines)? 
    A great example, which Democrat Sided News Agencies reported in great details, is a Republican Senator was forced to retire after a sex scandal in his marriage.  This led to Republican Voters crossing Party-Lines, out of disgust, to vote in a Democrat as a Senator who later became President. 
  18. Is against term limits for elected officials?  Yes, the other Party has largely been against it also but look up the history on which Party has sponsored term limit legislation in Congress.
  19. Has always voted for increases in salary and salary for life with free life medical coverage that is better than any in the private sector? 
  20. Uses and creates racism and cultural bias to get votes and when elected does not fix the real or false problem because it is part of their power base?
  21. Has created the most trade agreements to end jobs in America?   An example is NAFTA and APTA.
  22. Has created taxation and legislation against companies that have forced them to close down, or move out of the United States?  A recent horrible trend is what is happening in the Medical Industry.
  23. Has refused to create correct taxation against companies who bring in foreign workers that replace American workers?
  24. Has supported lawsuit abuse loopholes that have caused litigation which closed down companies?
  25. Has voted against laws to fix lawsuit loopholes and limits to frivolous lawsuits?
  26. Has elected officials that are not enforcing laws and protecting businesses in many, many ocean ports in the United States which made them close down or shrink in business volume?
  27. Has spokesmen in the News Media and Film Industry who ridicule and make blanket statements against the voters of the other Political Party that insinuate and outright say the other Political Party voters are racists, cultural insensitive and war mongers with zero proof?
  28. Has voters of their Political Party believing the other Political Party's voters are all either racists, cultural insensitive, war mongers and do nothing to help the common man where the other Political Party's demographics show a much higher support of charity and greater cultural acceptance?
  29. Have their voters moving away from their own Party's controlled areas to move into areas controlled by the other Political Party because that is where the best jobs are located, the lowest taxes, highest standard of living and lower crime rates?
  30. Supports so many causes that are against many of the tenants found in the Bible?

(the list goes on and on and on.  Yes, there is a list of grievances against the other Political Party but as an exercise think about them compared to the list above.) 

No, the other Political Party is not even remotely perfect but the differences are absolutely startling.  To add onto the problem is the gross miss-information and propaganda being propagated without accountability or even a chance for the other Political Party to have equal time, rebuttal or even any time in the Main-Stream Media is beyond explanation. 

It obvious that Satanic Forces are using the Party that has the most power and control to achieve the strategies of self-destruction of mankind.  If the mainstream Media would hold Politicians accountable to their mandates, then the incomplete list of 30 items above would hopefully shrink or even be eliminated in some cases for BOTH PARTIES.

Christian Perspective

Consider the heroes and persons who were lifted up in the Scriptures as being exemplary.  They acted and conducted their lives conservatively to not impose on others, provide for themselves and never be a burden.  The Scriptures are very clear that we should be charitable, giving and helpful but the governmental state is not to take that role as a replacement.  When the government is not involved in social engineering, welfare and socialism then it has been shown in history that the people of God have organized charities, food banks, lodging, monetary assistance and small business have flourished along with the family unit is strengthened.  When government takes a leading role in social engineering, welfare and socialism then the opposite happens which is destruction of the family unit, charities are forced out, private food banks disappear, crime rate goes up and jobs also become scarce in the neediest of neighborhoods. 

Have you noticed that people want to live where there are jobs, taxes are low, crime is low, and the family unit is valued?  When researching the demographics on financially successful and family strong areas, the demographics in those areas are always overwhelmingly the political conservative party.  People from the other Political Party will move to these better areas and then began voting for their failed Political Party's candidates which immediately begins the tearing down of the benefits that attracted them to the area in the first place.

Gloria Alvarez

See this excellent video from Gloria Alvarez where she is explaining the differences between Socialism and Capitalism.

What to read next?

(1) Political Hypocrite (2) Communism and Socialism vs. Democracy with Additional Thoughts and Clarity on Fascism, (3) Liberalism and the arguments used, (4) Historical Racism in the United States and its use in Politics (5) A Democrat Conundrum (6) Peaceful People are Irrelevant Point