| Magi and the Magian Religion | 
		
		 Created Date: 30-Nov-2018  | 
	
	
		| 
		  | 
		
		 Last updated: 20-Feb-2021  | 
	
	
		| A
			A
			A 
			help
	     | 
	    
		    
			
	     | 
	
 
		Sections
		
Summary
The Magi religion is most commonly known as the State recognized and relied upon religious system in 
ancient Babylon and Persia.  This topic is a companion topic with the topic 
about the traditions concerning kings visiting the baby Jesus. 
The Magians had several responsibilities and functions, such as:
	- Dream cataloguers and interpreters.
 
	- Selectors of a king's successor.
 
	- Priests at the temples.
 
	- Overseers of Governmental laws and actions.
 
Additionally, the Magi had a priestly presence during the Seleucid, 
Parthian and Sasanian ruling periods 
in the Middle East areas.  As time went by, they migrated and took on new roles with the Romans 
and possibly other areas in ancient China.
Note that the Magian Priests could be 
considered part of a modern-day Governmental Parliament or type-of Congress, 
which had power and prestige with military protection and authority.
From one source, the Magi first were recognized in history around the 7th Century BC as a 
tribe in Persia, and another source as 6th Century BC. The tribe selected specific men to start a priesthood 
that practiced what we call today as occult practices that involved 
necromancy, 
albeit worship of only one god.  The religion may have had a
Scythian origin.  
The Magian Priests, when on duty along with potentially other times:
	- Wore white robes.
 
	- Hats that were pointed with side flaps.
 
	- An open and viewable face that was not covered.
 
The proposed intention was to make them appear as those who were supposedly 
cleansed from all faults, sins and indignities.  
The predominate beliefs and practices of the Magians:
	- No images of gods.
 
	- Believed in a one god.
 
	- Temples contained no monuments or shrines, just a sacred fire.
 
	- Believed in the destruction of what they deemed to be unclean forms of 
	life, such as reptiles and insects.
 
	- Held a high reverence for cleanliness in elements of their dress and 
	buildings.
 
	- Disposed of the deceased priests and others by place the body in an area 
	for birds to eat, or the body was covered in wax then buried in a tomb or 
	ground. 
 
	- Had many similar elements in common with the Jews.
 
Wiki Source information
Some facts and theories about the Magi from wiki that is incomplete but a 
good starting list:
	- According to wiki, the oldest reference known about the Magi is from a 
	Greek reference in the 6th Century BC by Heraclitus of Ephesus who 
	pronounces curses on the rites and rituals of the Magi.
 
	- Another is from 5th Century BC, est. 520 BC, from the trilingual 
	 Behistun Inscription of Darius the Great , the Magi were rebels and were 
	referred to as Magians.
 
	- An additional Greek reference is from the Gentlemen-soldier Xenophon in 
	the 4th Century BC. Xenophon s description of the Magians are the 
	authorities of all religious matters in the Persian Achaemenid court. Note 
	that Achaemenid Empire is also called the First Persian Empire.
 
	- There is the theory that Magi were followers of Zoroaster. According to 
	the Encyclopedia Britannica 7:69, it states they were not followers. At a 
	later period: Philo of Alexandria, Cicero, Philo and other historical men 
	recorded that the Magi were attached to Roman Senior Courts where they were 
	esteemed to have special skills.
 
Encylopaedia of Iranica (Persia is ancient Iran)
	
		Excerpts from the Encylopaedia of Iranica:
http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/magi 
	-  The word  Magus  is attested in Old Persian, Elamite, Akkadian, 
	Aramaic, Parthian, and Sasanian documents as well as in texts of classical 
	antiquity. Its earliest mention is in the Bisotun inscription of Darius I 
	the Great (see DARIUS iii), according to which, in 522 BCE, a Magus (magu-) 
	by the name Gaumāta claimed to be Bardiya, son of the predecessor king, 
	Cyrus II the Great (see CYRUS iii), and usurped the royal power (DB I 35-70; 
	Schmitt, p. 51, col. I, lines 35-43, etc.). In the Babylonian version of the 
	same inscription, he is called  a Mede   the Magu   (von Voigtlander, p. 14, 
	line 15: ma-da-a-a   ma-gu- u). In the Elamite version of the same text he 
	is designated as ma-ku-i  (see Grillot-Susini et al., col. I, line 38). Thus 
	it seems that Elamite and Babylonian scribes could not find any equivalent 
	in their own languages to render Gaumāta s title. Herodotus (3.61, etc.) 
	also mentions this individual under the name Smerdis, calling him a magos. 
	According to him, King Cambyses had installed him as steward of his 
	household. Later, when Cambyses was in Egypt, this Smerdis impersonated 
	Cyrus s son who bore the same name Smerdis but had already been murdered 
	secretly by the order of his brother Cambyses. Thus he usurped the throne of 
	the Persian kings. 
 
	-  According to Herodotus (1.101), Magi were one of six Median tribes and 
	formed the hereditary priestly clan. He adds that they occupied an 
	influential position at the Median court as dream interpreters and 
	soothsayers (1.107). Following Herodotus, many classical authors also 
	considered the Magi to be a Median tribe, but no satisfactory Indo-European 
	etymology of the word magu- has been suggested, and therefore some scholars 
	suppose that it was  an aboriginal addition to Median society  (Frye, 1972, 
	p. 87). 
 
	-  Not only in Media, but also in Persia the Magi were the only groups of 
	priests, although in the Elamite regions of Iran naturally priests of 
	ancient local cults also functioned. It is possible that, during the 
	supremacy of the Medes over Iranian domains, the Median Magi also exercised 
	sacerdotal functions. 
 
 
		 | 
	
Comparison to Judaism
Analysis and theory concerning the Magi when compared to Judaism based on 
external and Biblical information:
	
		
		
		
	
	
		| 
		  | 
		
		Characteristics (during the life-time 
		of Daniel the Prophet) | 
		
		Magian | 
		
		Judaism | 
	
	
		| 
		1 | 
		
		Monotheistic God Belief  | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes | 
	
	
		| 
		2 | 
		
		God is good, the author of all good, but opposed by a malevolent evil 
		spirit | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes | 
	
	
		| 
		3 | 
		
		A Hereditary Priesthood, based on tribe, which was the spokesperson and mediator to God | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes | 
	
	
		| 
		4 | 
		
		Government depended upon the Priesthood | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes | 
	
	
		| 
		5 | 
		
		A sense of clean and unclean forms of life | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes | 
	
	
		| 
		6 | 
		
		Served several religions | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		No | 
	
	
		| 
		7 | 
		
		King makers, who selected government 
		officials and crowned rulers | 
		
		Yes | 
		
		Yes/No ** | 
	
** King Saul was selected by Judge Samuel in '1 Samuel 9'.  King David 
was selected by Judge Samuel after God rejected King Saul in '1 Samuel 16'.  
King Solomon was selected by King David to be King because the Lord God told 
David to select him as detailed in '1 Chron 28:1-5'.
In the Book of Daniel
This is helpful information as it applies to King Darius
	
		| This is an excerpt from the "Three Kings visit the baby Jesus?"
regarding the Magi in the Book of Daniel with the reference to Darius. Note that there are some discussions and disagreements on 
who Darius was in history outside of the Biblical Scriptures.  
	- In  In and Around the Book of Daniel  by Charles Boutflower, Darius may 
	have been Cyrus s son who ruled Persia from 530-522 BC. 
 
	- In  Notes on some problems in the Book of Daniel , pp 12-14,  It was 
	common for ancient rulers to use different names in various parts of their 
	realms. Thus Darius may have been a localize name for Cyrus.
 
	- In  Darius the Mede  by Nutley, N.J. Presbyterian; Reformed Publishing 
	Co 1974, Darius was an alias for Ugbaru, governor of Guitium who was 
	appointed by Cyrus to be ruler over Babylon. This is most likely the case an 
	solves the problem with reconciling names in history sources. Darius is most 
	likely a Title and a Rank in government.
 
 
		 | 
	
What to read next?
What is
Salvation?  Is it possible to
lose Salvation?  We have
eternal life. 
Evolution is not real.  When a Christian
suffers 
is there benefits from it. 
Rewards in heaven.  Do we
Tithe?  
What does the
3rd Commandment tell us?  What is
Grace 
and Mercy?  Is there an
Age of Accountability?  Is there a place of
unending punishment and 
exile form God?